Exploring Disability through Phenomenology: Analysing M.T. Anderson's Feed and Frances Itani's The Deafening
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54392/ajir2548Keywords:
Phenomenology, Disability Studies, Lived Experience, Social Model of Disability, EmbodimentAbstract
This article explores aspects of disability in M.T. Anderson's Feed and Frances Itani's The Deafening through the mechanics of the Phenomenological Theory. The phenomenological approach is defined by a focus on lived experience and subjectivity, with particular attention to how each constructs meaning from their knowledge of disability. In Feed, the characters are cognitively disabled because of a technological impairment in the form of a brain implant that regulates their thoughts, wants, and feelings for them, stripping them of their autonomy and agency. The analysis focuses on how structural aspects of the societal technological systems contribute to this condition of mental disability. In contrast, The Deafening depicts deafness as a socially invalidating disability, such that Grania's situated being was influenced by society's inability to improve access to communication, resulting in her social isolation. Both these works reveal that disability is not a straightforward biological fact; it is a socially reproduced, corporeal experience established through the mediation of external actors. This paper demonstrates the application of phenomenology to the theorisation of disability, examining the factors through which disability is lived and internalised by people in different societal contexts. Therefore, it presents phenomenology as a potentially important avenue for disability studies, as it offers a way to theorise disability.
References
Ahmadi, A., Yulianto, B., Khoiri, A.A., Yani, M.T., Jamain, N.B., Yusuf, K., Efendi, A.N., Hariyati, N.R., Savira, S.I. and Khozin, N., (2025). Poetry therapy, disability, and trauma expression: A therapeutic-phenomenological perspective. Journal of Intellectual Disability-Diagnosis and Treatment, 13(3), 335-341.
Anderson, M.T. (2002). Feed. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick Press https://archive.org/details/feed00ande
Davis, L.J. (Ed.). (2013). The Disability Studies Reader (4th ed.). Routledge, 600. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203077887
Goodley, D. (2024). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5913821
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2021). Key concerns for critical disability studies. International Journal of Disability and Social Justice, 1(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.13169/intljofdissocjus.1.1.0027
Hammer, S.T., Stutts, L. A. (2025). The impact of disability representation on disability stigma in a general population. Rehabilitation Psychology, 70(4), 365-371. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39760718
Haraway, D. (1985). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, New York, Routledge, 149-181. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/donna-haraway-a-cyborg-manifesto
Husserl, E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. George Allen and Unwin ltd London, 465. http://indianculture.gov.in/ideas-general-introduction-pure-phenomenology-0
Itani, F. (2003). The Deafening. Grove Press. https://groveatlantic.com/book/deafening/
Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press, 276.https://iupress.org/9780253009227/feminist-queer-crip/
Lane, H. (1992). The Mask of Benevolence: Disabling the Deaf Community. Knopf.
Lethem, J. (1999). Motherless Brooklyn. NewYork, Doubleday. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL34335M/Motherless_Brooklyn
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge, New York.
Mitchell, D.T., Snyder, S.L. (2000). Narrative Prosthesis: Disability and the Dependencies of Discourse. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11523
Oliver, M. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
Puar, J.K. (2017). The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Duke University Press.
Siebers, T. (2008). Disability and the Politics of Embodiment. University of Michigan Press.
Siebers, T. (2008). Disability Theory. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.309723
ter Haar, A., Hilberink, S. R., & Schippers, A. (2025). Lived Experiences of Public Disability Representations: A Scoping Review. Disabilities, 5(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities5020038
Thomson, R. G. (1997). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. Columbia University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1970304959893887177
Tremain, S. (2017). Foucault and the Feminist Philosophy of Disability. University of Michigan Press.
Ventura, J., Das, S. (2025). Somaesthetic socio-cultural design for disability: Rethinking body marginality. Journal of Somaesthetics and Anthropology, 11(1), 22–41. https://journals.aau.dk/index.php/JOS/article/view/10586
Wilks, R. (2024). Challenging equality law: The deaf legal dilemma. Hart Publishing. https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/12875046
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Keerthana R, Prakash A, Subhash Y. Kamalkar, Kannan Prasad K (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.