A Bibliometric and Scoping Review of Research Integrity among Research Scholars

Jateendra Das; Sarat Kumar Rout; Bikshyatsib Sardar; Pranayini Sahoo; Soumyabrata Mahapatra; Shubhashree Dash

doi:10.54392/

Authors

Jateendra Das Department of Education, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, India Author https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2093-4307
Sarat Kumar Rout Department of Education, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, India Author https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6478-3807
Bikshyatsib Sardar Department of Education, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, India Author https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2626-904X
Pranayini Sahoo Department of Education, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, India Author https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4914-9751
Soumyabrata Mahapatra Department of Education, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, India Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7699-9162
Shubhashree Dash Department of Education, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54392/

Keywords:

Research Integrity, Research Misconduct, Research Ethics and Questionable Research Practice

Abstract

This article describes the scoping that was grounded on Arksey and O’Malley's (2005) mode of operation, and follows the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. The scoping review aimed to explore a global perspective on research integrity among research scholars, given how little we know about the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of research academics around research integrity. The researchers completed a systematic search for articles spanning 368 records published from 2014 - 2023 from Science Direct, EBSCO and ProQuest. Ultimately, 37 empirical studies were included after screening and a critical appraisal. The co-authorship network illustrated distinct small, but meaningful clusters with limited institutional connections among researchers in the field, while the keywords analysis revealed dominant themes of research misconduct, research integrity, and knowledge, revealing gaps in areas such as questionable research practices and informed consent. Additionally, despite illustrating a great deal of variation, research integrity is generally overlapping, along discipline and across regions, growing with relative higher rates of questionable research practices, including academic authorship, selective reporting, and p-hacking, while as before, at least related, and hardly even acknowledged, of being involved in Fabrication, Falsification and Plagiarism (FFP). Yes, notably, barriers towards protecting research integrity manifest as publication pressures, and institutional support is horrendous. A positive association was given for publication among researchers, at least apparently correlated, and provided with respect to researchers with misconduct. Scholarly education about ethics and institutional support may vary widely, which suggests a range of variables for focus on and moreover blanket customized training and institutional restructuring supporting research integrity.

References

Abdi, S., Fieuws, S., Nemery, B., Dierickx, K. (2021) Do we achieve anything by teaching research integrity to starting PhD students?. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8 (1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00908-5

Agnoli, F., Wicherts, J.M., Veldkamp, C.L., Albiero, P., Cubelli, R. (2017) Questionable research practices among Italian research psychologists. Plos One, 12(3), e0172792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172792

Alahmad, G., Alshahrani, K.M., Alduhaim, R.A., Alhelal, R., Faden, R.M., Shaheen, N.A. (2023) Awareness of medical professionals regarding research ethics in a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A survey to assess training needs. Healthcare, 11 (20), 2718. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202718

Allum, N., Reid, A., Bidoglia, M., Gaskell, G., Aubert-Bonn, N., Buljan, I., Fuglsang, S., Horbach, S., Kavouras, P., Marusic, A., Mejlgaard, N., Pizzolato, D., Roje, R., Tijdink, J., Veltri, G. (2023) Researchers on research integrity: A survey of European and American researchers. F1000Research, 12,187. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128733.1

Altbach, P.G., Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542

Alzahrani, M.S., Ingle, N.A., Assery, M.K. (2020). Knowledge, attitude, and practice about plagiarism among dental interns and postgraduate dental students in Riyadh city, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 7(9), 3327-3334. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20203888

Anderson, M.S., Ronning, E.A., De Vries, R., Martinson, B.C. (2007). The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13, 437-461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5

Anderson, M.S., Shaw, M.A., Steneck, N.H., Konkle, E., Kamata, T. (2013). Research integrity and misconduct in the academic profession. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research Springer, 28, 217–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5836-0_5

Andronic, O., Bolocan, A., Păduraru, D. N., Ion, D., Musat, F. (2022). How much do Romanian medical students know about research ethics? A survey. European Science Editing, 48, e76261. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e76261

Arksey, H., O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 19-32.https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Ateudjieu, J., Tchio-Nighie, K.H., Kemta Lekpa, F., Koutio Douanla, I.M., Kiadjieu Dieumo, F.F., Ntsekendio, P.N., Naah, F., Bekolo, C.E., Bisseck, A.C. (2022). Training needs of health researchers in research ethics in Cameroon: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 697. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03767-z

Azakir, B., Mobarak, H., Al Najjar, S., El Naga, A.A., Mashaal, N. (2020). Knowledge and attitudes of physicians toward research ethics and scientific misconduct in Lebanon. BMC Medical Ethics, 21(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00475-5

Chen, L., Li, Y., Wang, J., Li, Y., Tan, X., Guo, X. (2024). Knowledge, attitudes and practices about research misconduct among medical residents in southwest China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05277-6

Chua, J.Y.L., Lee, C.S.L., Yeo, K.P., Ali, Y., Lim, C.L. (2022). Perception and reaction of Nanyang Technological University (NTU) researchers to different forms of research integrity education modality. BMC Medical Ethics, 23(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00824-6

Costa, M., Crabtree, C., Holbein, J.B., Landgrave, M. (2023). Is that ethical? An exploration of political scientists’ views on research ethics. Research & Politics, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680231209553

Das, J., Rout, S.K. (2023). Taxonomy of research misconducts: A conceptual analysis. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 11(4), f523-f535. http://www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2304684.pdf

De Boer, H., Enders, J., Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organizations, Springer, 1,137–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5831-8_5

Dhingra, D., Mishra, D. (2014). Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India. Indian journal of medical ethics, 11(2), 104–107. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2014.026

Drenth, P.J. (2012). A European code of conduct for research integrity. Promoting research integrity in a global environment, 161.https://allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/A-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity_final.10.10.pdf

Evans, N., Buljan, I., Valenti, E., Bouter, L., Marusic, A., De Vries, R., Widdershoven, G., EnTIRE Consortium. (2022). Stakeholders' experiences of research integrity support in universities: A qualitative study in three European countries. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(5), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00390-5

Fanelli, D. (2009) How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. Plos One, 4 (5), e5738.

Feenstra, R.A., Delgado Lopez-Cozar, E., Pallares-Dominguez, D. (2021). Research misconduct in the fields of ethics and philosophy: Researchers' perceptions in Spain, Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00278-w

Felaefel, M., Salem, M., Jaafar, R., Jassim, G., Edwards, H., Rashid-Doubell, F., Yousri, R., Ali, N.M., Silverman, H. (2018). A cross-sectional survey study to assess prevalence and attitudes regarding research misconduct among investigators in the Middle East. Journal of academic ethics, 16(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9295-9

Fraser, H., Parker, T., Nakagawa, S., Barnett, A., Fidler, F. (2018). Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution. Plos One, 13 (7), e0200303. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200303

Gasparyan, A.Y., Ayvazyan, L., Blackmore, H., Kitas, G.D. (2011). Writing a narrative biomedical review: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatology International, 31(11), 1409-1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3

Gopalakrishna, G., Ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J.M., Bouter, L.M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. Plos One, 17 (2), e0263023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023

Grosek, S., Pleterski Rigler, D., Podbregar, M., Erculj, V. (2023). Knowledge of and attitudes towards medical research ethics among first year doctoral students in Slovenia at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 828. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04809-w

Haven, T.L., Tijdink, J.K., Martinson, B.C., Bouter, L.M. (2019). Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam. Plos One, 14(1), e0210599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210599

Hofmann, B., Bredahl Jensen, L., Eriksen, M.B., Helgesson, G., Juth, N., Holm, S. (2020). Research integrity among Phd students at the faculty of medicine: A comparison of three Scandinavian universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(4), 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264620929230

Hofmann, B., Holm, S. (2019). Research integrity: environment, experience, or ethos?. Research Ethics, 15(3-4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119880844

Hofmann, B., Thoresen, M., Holm, S. (2023). Research integrity attitudes and behaviors are difficult to alter: Results from a ten years follow-up study in Norway. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 18(1-2), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221150032

Israel, M., Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209779

Kaiser, M., Drivdal, L., Hjellbrekke, J., Ingierd, H., Rekdal, O.B. (2021). Questionable research practices and misconduct among Norwegian researchers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00351-4

Kumar, B.S. (2020) Research misconduct. National Journal of Basis Medical Science, 11(2), 217-218. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355392442_Research_Misconduct

Maggio, L., Dong, T., Driessen, E., Artino, Jr. A. (2019). Factors associated with scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 74-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0501-x

Martinson, B.C., Anderson, M.S., De Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a

Mathur, A., Lean, S.F., Maun, C., Walker, N., Cano, A., Wood, M.E. (2019). Research ethics in inter- and multi-disciplinary teams: Differences in disciplinary interpretations. Plos One, 14(11), e0225837. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225837

Metcalfe, J., Wheat, K., Munafò, M., Parry, J. (2020). Research integrity: A landscape study, Vitae.

Mnasri, S., Jaber, F. (2024). How do cancer research scientists deal with machines and consumables? Exploring research ethics from an inductive ethnographic perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 392. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02920-x

Nishimura, R., Takeuchi, J., Sakuma, M., Uchida, K., Higaonna, M., Kinjo, N., Sakakibara, F., Nakamura, T., Kosaka, S., Yoshimura, S., Ueda, S., Morimoto, T. (2021). Experience and awareness of research integrity among Japanese physicians: A nationwide cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 11(10), e052351. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052351

Okonta, P.I., Rossouw, T. (2014). Misconduct in research: A descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country. BMC Medical Ethics, 15, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-25

Olesen, A.P., Amin, L., Mahadi, Z. (2018). In their own words: Research misconduct from the perspective of researchers in Malaysian universities. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24 (6), 1755-1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9997-9

Palla, I.A., Singson, M. (2023). How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A case study of Indian researchers. Accountability in Research, 30(8), 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2078712

Poduthase, H., Garza, L., Wood, J. (2018). Scientific research misconduct in social science research: What is it and how can we address it?. Sociology International Journal, 2(2), 85-86. https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2018.02.00036

Pupovac, V., Prijic-Samarzija, S., Petrovecki, M. (2017). Research misconduct in the Croatian scientific community: A survey assessing the forms and characteristics of research misconduct. Science and engineering ethics, 23(1), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9767-0

Roy, S., Edwards, M.A. (2023). NSF Fellows' perceptions about incentives, research misconduct, and scientific integrity in STEM academia, Scientific Reports, 13(1,) 5701.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32445-3

Russell, W.M.S., Burch, R.L., Hume, C.W. (1959). The principles of humane experimental technique, 238. London: Methuen. https://caat.jhsph.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Addendum.docx

Satalkar, P., Shaw, D. (2019) How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland. BMC Medical Ethics, 20(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0410-x

Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M.G., Macey, W.H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809

Sivasubramaniam, S.D., Cosentino, M., Ribeiro, L., Marino, F. (2021). Unethical practices within medical research and publication– An exploratory study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00072-y

Steneck, N.H. (2003) ORI introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Office of Research Integrity. https://ori.hhs.gov/ori-introduction-responsible-conduct-research

Steneck, N.H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y

Stroebe, W., Postmes, T., Spears, R. (2012). Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 670–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460687

Tang L. (2019). Five ways China must cultivate research integrity. Nature, 575(7784), 589–591. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03613-1

Tarboush, N.A., Alkayed, Z., Alzoubi, K.H., Al-Delaimy, W.K. (2020). The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), Article 121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02040-5

The Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). Checklist for prevalence studies: Critical appraisal tools for use in JBI systematic reviews. https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

Tiruneh, G., Yilma, M., Wakuma, B., Abdisa, E., Bayisa, L., Nichols, M., Bedeker, A., Tiffin, N. (2024). Compliance with research ethics in epidemiological studies targeted to conflict-affected areas in Western Ethiopia: Validity of informed consent (VIC) by information comprehension and voluntariness (ICV). BMC Medical Ethics, 25(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01003-5

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K.K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M.D.J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Pronovost, C., McGowan, J., Jadevere, M., Garritty, C., Lewin, S., Straus, S.E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Troughton, L., Obasi, A. (2022). An exploration of practices affecting research integrity in global health partnerships. BMJ Global Health, 7(8), Article e009092. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009092

Vie, K.J. (2020). How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 16(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-020-00102-6

Wolff, W., Baumann, L., Englert, C. (2018). Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research. PLOS ONE, 13(6), Article e0199554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199554

Zhao, L., Li, Y., Feng, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, M. (2022). Research on the influencing factors of scientific researchers' integrity based on grounded theory. Procedia Computer Science, 214, 1467–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.11.332