Measuring Indigenous Feedback for Impact Assessment of Economic Development Schemes in Paschimanchal Region, West Bengal, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54392/ajir2531Keywords:
Economic development schemes, Indigenous feedback, Relative importance index, Positive economic outcomesAbstract
Development schemes are targeted for socio-economic improvement of the deprived down-trodden; but in most cases the targeted goals remain unaccomplished due to different socio-cultural and technological constraints on the part of the target group and also discrepancies on the part of the administrators, planners, implementers and scheme-monitoring committees. The present study is conducted in Paschimanchal, a planning region of West Bengal - the home to different indigenous communities of the State; based on the objectives - identifying success and failure of schemes, evaluating schemes on basis of indigenous feedback, framing measures for avoiding constraints to ensure that indigenous communities avail and derive benefit from these schemes for economic development in the region. We conducted primary survey in the indigenous households of the study area and used Relative Importance Index as a statistical tool to grade and rank which variable is potentially hindering the development of the indigenous people. The study revealed that most of the schemes have failed and respondents could not take benefit of the schemes; while Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme benefitted the people but also suffered from limitations that prevented its total success. We tried to recommend certain measures to eliminate the bottlenecks to promote positive economic outcomes and boost financial security of the poor and needy.
References
Abinaya Ishwarya, G. K., & Rajkumar, D. (2021). Analysis of ergonomic risk factors in construction industry. Materials Today: Proceedings, 37, 2415–2418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.269
Akadiri, O. P. (2011). Development of a multi-criteria approach for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wolverhampton). University of Wolverhampton.
Baviskar, A. (2009). In the belly of the river: Tribal conflicts over development in the Narmada Valley. Oxford University Press.
Bheemaraya, B. (2022). Indian tribal welfare schemes and their implementation: A study. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2012
Boakye, M. K., & Adanu, S. K. (2022). On-site building construction workers’ perspective on environmental impacts of construction-related activities: A relative importance index (RII) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) approach. Sustainable Environment, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2022.2141158 ap.pensoft.net
Bohm, M., & Wermser, D. (2024). Nomadic internet connectivity under forest canopy [Conference paper]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383532361
Chakraborty, B. (2014). MGNREGA policy and application. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34(3/4), 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-09-2013-0094
Chandrakar, K., Chandrakar, D. K., & Das, D. (2023). Strengthening tribal populace of Chhattisgarh: Obstacles and opportunities. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 8(1), 766–770. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2023.8.1.0081
Chatterjee, S. (2020). Role of local institutions in sustainable development: A case study of tribal communities in West Bengal. Journal of Rural Development, 38(2), 121–134.
Chowdhury, R. (2019). Impact of skill development programs on tribal youth: A study of PMKVY. Journal of Development Studies, 36(4), 50–65.
Davies, J., White, J., Wright, A., Maru, Y., & La Flamme, M. (2008). Applying the sustainable livelihoods approach in Australian desert Aboriginal development. The Rangeland Journal, 30(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ07038
Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1995). Ecology and equity: The use and abuse of nature in contemporary India. Routledge.
Ghosh, A., & Awasthi, R. (2016). Tribal entrepreneurship in India: A case study on employment schemes and their impacts. International Journal of Rural Development, 12(2), 112–128.
Gow, D. D. (1996). The anthropology of development: Discourse, agency, and culture [Review of An anthropological critique of development: The growth of ignorance; Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World, by M. Hobart & A. Escobar]. Anthropological Quarterly, 69(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/3317989
Goyal, A., Kumar, R., & Goyal, A. (2022). An analysis of determinants of employment benefits in MNREG Scheme: Evidence from Haryana, India. Journal of Rural Development, 41(3), 308–317.
Harriss-White, B. (2003). India’s informal economy: A survey of research and policy. International Development Journal, 22(3), 191–214.
Hazra, K. K., Sengupta, P., Chel, M. M., Mete, J., & Karmakar, P. (2019). Socio-economic transformation of tribal women through MGNREGA: A research study on Irula community women in Purulia, West Bengal. In Development of SCs and STs in globalised world: Legal issues and livelihood challenges (pp. xxx–xxx). Kunal Books.
Hooker, R. H., & Yule, G. U. (1906). Note on estimating the relative influence of two variables upon a third. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 69, 197–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/2339552 ouci.dntb.gov.ua
International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. (2025). The Indigenous World 2025. IWGIA.
Kumar, J. S., & Shobana, D. (2023). Impact of government schemes on tribal development in Nagaland. Shanlax International Journal of Economics, 11(3), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.34293/economics.v11i3.6184
Kumar, M. (2020). Evaluating skill development initiatives for tribal youth in India: Opportunities and challenges. Indian Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 75-89.
Kumar, R. (2022). Local governance in tribal-dominated areas of India: An investigation into economic, social, and political effects. Journal of Rural Development, 41(1), 1-14.
Kumari, P., & Dahiya, S. (2022). Determinants of adoption of PM-KISAN Scheme: Empirical evidence from Jhajjar District in Haryana. Journal of Rural Development, 41(4), 510-523.
Larsen, R. K., Feiring, M., Grimble, C., Gustafsson, M., Hunsberger, C., Marani, M., & Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (2025). Finding the cracks: How do frontline officials maneuver state institutions to advance Indigenous rights to land and environment? Earth System Governance, 25, Article 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2025.100270
Liyousew, G. B., & D’Ambrosio, C. (2021). Social protection and multidimensional poverty: Lessons from Ethiopia, India and Peru. World Development, 147, 105634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105634
Martin, R. (2012). Corruption in the MGNREGS: Assessing an index. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(8), 13-15.
Mehta, G., Barwal, P., & Sharma, S. (2022). Impact of government development programmes on the livelihood of scheduled tribes: A study of Kinnaur district, Himachal Pradesh. International Journal of Farm Sciences, 12(3), 71-73. https://doi.org/10.5958/2250-0499.2022.00076.3
Mohasin, A. T., Ajim, S. T., & Nilesh, U. B. (2024). A comprehensive review of tribal welfare in Maharashtra State of India. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Humanity, Education and Society (Vol. 3, No. 1).
Olcay, G. (2021). Identifying principal risk factors of Turkish construction sector according to their probability of occurrences: A relative importance index (RII) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) approach. International Journal of Construction Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2021.1946901
Panda, S., & Guha, A. (2014). Lodhas of West Bengal: A case study. The Tribal Tribune.
Patnaik, P. (2011). Land reforms and tribal welfare: A critical review. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(30), 38-45.
Puhazhendhi, V., & Jayarajan, S. (2008). Role of SHGs in tribal welfare: A case study of Tamil Nadu. Journal of Rural Development, 27(3), 245-263.
Rai, S., & Mishra, S. (2017). The impact of MGNREGA on tribal livelihoods: A review. Development Studies Journal, 22(5), 102-116.
Rao, P. (2014). Sustainability of livelihoods in tribal areas: A policy perspective. Tribal Development Review, 41(2), 58-73.
Ravi, S., & Engler, M. (2015). Workfare as an effective way to fight poverty: The case of India’s NREGS. World Development, 67, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.09.029
Sangha, K. K., Duvert, A., Archer, R., & Russell-Smith, J. (2020). Unrealised economic opportunities in remote Indigenous communities: Case studies from northern Australia. Social Science & Humanities Open, 2, Article 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100093
Sarkar, S., & Roy, D. (2019). Impact of tribal welfare development programmes and schemes on scheduled tribes. In Development of SCs and STs in globalised world: Legal issues and livelihood challenges (pp. xxx–xxx). Kunal Books.
Sathyapalan, J., Rangacharyulu, S. V., Digambar, A., Anuradha, P., Mishra, N., Jayasree, K., et al. (2020). Report on one decade of MGNREGS. Centre for Wage Employment and Livelihoods, National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj.
Satyanarayana, T. (2022). Social protection through MGNREGS: A study of Rayalaseema region in Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Rural Development, 41(1), 102-119.
Shah, D., & Gugulothu, S. (2024). Challenges in empowering tribal communities: A case study of Gujjars and Bakerwals in Jammu and Kashmir, India. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 3(5).
Verma, M. M. (1996). Tribal development in India: Programmes and perspectives. Mittal Publications.
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mun Mun Nandy, Nirmalya Das, Santu Guchhait (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.